Drinking Age Limit 18 or 21 - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1410 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/07/01 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Lowering The Drinking Age Essay Did you like this example? Have you ever wonder why kids tend to drink illegally?. Now if the drinking age was lowered it would mature kids. Only because they will get the feeling of drinking responsibly so it might change the way the kids would drink. While if the drinking age limit would be 18 it could get kids out of trouble,. it should be lowered to stop underage drinking. Because it would help small bars get better profit. Also 116 other countries out of 180 already have it at 18. One might argue that 18 is too low for a drinking age limit because kids are not mature. But iIt could help out local bars make a better profit and if they go to bars they would be more responsible by learning how to drink responsibly instead of going to a party and possible hurting themselves. Because it would teach the kids better responsibilities. Therefore it would be better if the drinking age limit was 18 because it would help bars get better and they should end up more mature with the way they would take drinking. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Drinking Age Limit 18 or 21" essay for you Create order If they lowered the drinking age limit to 18 it would help out local bars. There would be more people showing up instead of them going out to parties and hiding it, if they drinking limit was 21.They could be more formal about it at bars aAnd not have to worry about police if they are trying to hide it. One of my biggest reasons is that fIf the adults are being reckless with their drinking It could get ugly but if they go to bars they can be assured they should be safer. And it would help out small local bars get going. And Im just worried about all the 18 year olds that are being caught drinking because they tend to rebel against the law and go crazy, because they think since they are adults they can do anything but they cant sadly and they will get in trouble for it. But if the drinking age limit would be 18 think what if it would all change because when the individual turns 21 people tend to not drink as much just like tobacco even tho one may be 18 it doesnt mean they are gonna use it because some people dont like it. Over all its just safer to go to bars and celebrate then going out to a party and having the potential of getting in trouble. There has always been a huge fascination with alcohol. It can damage our bodies and have serious side effects, but this is why our fascination with alcohol needs to be noticed, and the age limit should be lowered. Countries across the globe have legal ages ranging from 16 to 18, to no age limit at all, which makes the United States the only country in the world to have an age limit set to 21. Children, who grow up in countries with lower age limits, learn their limit of consumption, they dont go out and get wasted every weekend, and they drink in safe environments. They are raised around alcohol and are raised by people who have no fascination with it because alcohol is simply a part of life. If they would lower the drinking age limit to 18, the chances of car accidents would lower because kids would be safer with how they drink. Thats because they learn that the driver needs to be safe when if the individual decides to drink so they wont drive home. In the united states 31% road traffic deaths are caused by alcohol. This percentage is higher than other countries that the drinking age limit is lower, in france 29 Percent, Great britain 16 percent, Germany 9 percent, China 4 percent, and Israel 3 percent. Although the United States increased the MLDA to 21 in 1984, its rate of traffic accidents and fatalities in the 1980s decreased less than that of European countries whose legal drinking ages are lower than 21. And that shows if the limit is lower the amount of accidents would be traffic accidents with alcohol would probably be lower. Having the age limit 21 is largely ineffective to teens because they tend to break the rule eventually so why dont they just lower it? Because if they were able to lower it the kids would maybe realize it is not that bad because kids dont wanna go to college to and do nothing so they tend to do bad things. But if they went into college with the mindset of its legal and they are not gonna get in trouble it seems like it wouldnt happen near as often as it does now. When tend to drink it seems to spike your behavior and make the drinker seem rude to certain people. The reason why they act like they are worse is because they are drunk and they are mean and dont want to do what people tell them to do. In some cases that could cause violence and people could get hurt from fights. Now if the age was 18 it could teach them responsibility that they shouldnt drink as often as kids do nowadays. Having kids not being allowed to drink in bars or in restaurants tend to lead kids into bad habits of drinking in bad places like Parties or at peoples houses trying to hide it. This could cause the kids to be binge drinking. Binge drinking is where you sit down and have more than 5 beers or have more than .08 grams percent above. Also kids that do start to drink illegally tend to being drink at some point in their life. To be specific about the ages when kids start to drink a lot its about 18-34 In the end they tend to have bad behavior. If they were to lower the limit there would be less amount of kids drinking because they dont do it as much because they wont get the thrill of getting caught or getting in trouble. So the kids would be safer if it was lower in my opinion. But it is also crazy how the kids can serve the country before they can drink in my opinion that is kinda crazy. Only because once that person has the privilege to serve for your country it should open up other opportunities like drinking. Back in 1984 it was legal for people to buy alcohol at the age of 18. However, these declines started in 1980 before the national 1987 law which mandated states to have 21 year old alcohol purchase laws. Now why did they change that to 21. If the limit was 18 it could also cut down on the amount of fake ids. Because when kids get fake ids it allows them access into places they shouldnt go when they are 20 or lower like bars, but most kids tend to use fake ideas to buy alcohol, Also you can get in some serious trouble for having a fake id on campus in college you could lose your privilege of going to that college only because they think its cool to drink. It still doesnt make sense why kids will take that risk of losing everything to drink when all they have to do is wait a couple of years and they can do it whenever they want. In my thesis it was explained how their is 116 other countries with the age limit of 18 out of 180 which makes me wonder why does our country have to be so different compared to the other countries. Now the reason the drinking age limit should be lowered only because it would help out some driving accidents because kids that tend to drink make dumb decisions and end up hurting themself. Like in a car accident also maybe. Also it could possibly help mature the dDrinker. Well basically they do it as a rebellious kinda behavior. They also tend to think it makes them cool but it really isnt. Now if the limit was 18 it would teach them earlier that drinking isnt near as much fun as they think. Work Cited Dave Anderson. Top 10 reasons the drinking age should be lowered to 18, Listland, 17 Jan, 2016, www.listland.com/16506-2/ Philip Smith Is it time to lower the legal drinking age?, Alternet, 1 Feb, 2018, www.alternet.org. Caleb Daniloff Drinking: 18 vs 21, Bu Today, 10-21-2010, www.bu.edu. Should The Drinking Age be Lowered From 21 to a younger age, ProCon.org, 3-10-2016, www.drinking age.procon.org. Ruth C. Engs, Professor, why the drinking age should be lowered, Indiana University, 2014 https://hal.handle.net/2022117594.

Political News Medi An Important Component Of American...

Political News Media American politics includes a series of conflicts and compromises between the different components of government. The division between the Democrats and Republicans in Congress often reflect the public as each group champions their often controversial opinions with the hope they are enacted as laws. Trying to make sense of the American government and politics, therefore, includes a lot of in-depth analysis of the underlying issues and political ideologies of each group. News media is an important component of American democracy since it is the main source of political information for Americans. The mainstream media sources include TV, radio, print and Internet-based sources. The news media is an independent watchdog that closely monitors the political arena and conveys it to the public with the Liberal model being the most effective model of the American political news media. The increased popularity of the internet has directly contributed to a more informed populace as American citizens all around the world can easily access and analyze political news. The digital age has seen the mass circulation of rich analytical information that was previously only accessed by scholars and policy makers (Powe Jr, 1992). The rise of social media as a news outlet has drastically reduced publication costs allowing for a two-way interaction platform between government officials, reporters, and the general citizens. The American democratic system is based on the premise

Totalitarian Essay Free Essays

Germany, Italy, and the Soviet Union. The totalitarian regimes of the 1920’s-1930’s. These regimes, although in different areas, shared a common goal; total control. We will write a custom essay sample on Totalitarian Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now In order to achieve this these regimes would need to gain the support of the people. Adolf Hitler was said, â€Å"Burn into the little man’s soul the proud conviction that though a little worm, he is nonetheless part of a great dragon. † I believe these regimes accomplished Hitler’s goal in this quote by using techniques; some different and some similar. Adolf Hitler of Germany was the leader of the Anti-Semitic Nazi regime. Hitler realized he needed real followers, people who fully believed in his practice. In order to achieve this he used propaganda, rewards, and feelings of national pride. The Nazi regime used posters, movies, books, and other devices to manipulate mold the people’s image to what the regime wanted them to see instead of the cruel reality that was really taking place. When people saw these glorified images, it put a good connotation on everything that the Nazi regime was doing and trying to accomplish. The people truly believed the Nazi regime was good because of what was being portrayed. Another way the Nazi regime accomplished their goal was by providing the people with the national pride that had been lost after the First World War. The Nazi’s brought Germany back on top. The Nazi’s liked to make everyone feel accepted and needed. They wanted everyone to feel like they were part of a big family. They even made low class workers with small jobs feel like they were such a big part of society and their job was an honor. The last main way the Nazi’s accomplished their goal was through rewards. The Nazi regime would reward their followers for being loyal and obeying commands. They would find your weaknesses and use them to lure you in. Everyone is naturally going to love someone who rewards them and makes them feel proud. People back then, were almost like dogs. When dogs do something good and you give it a treat, they know they did a good thing and will keep doing it. That’s how people’s minds were programmed into thinking they were doing the right thing. The Nazi regime abused and manipulated people’s emotions in order to achieve their goal. Benito Mussolini, the fascist leader of Italy, organized the Brown Shirts. Mussolini chose to use national pride and force to achieve his goal for total control. Mussolini realized the Italian people needed a country they could believe and take pride in. These people needed a government to make them proud again. So Mussolini portrayed his regime in a way that made the people proud. Mussolini wanted the loyalty to the country to come before anything else in every citizen’s life. Even family was expected to come after loyalty to Italy. For the people that did not see Italy as something to be proud in, Mussolini used force. The Brown Shirts would make sure you obeyed orders and remained loyal to your government. They would physically beat you into following the rules of the government. Mussolini and his regime focused on using physical techniques to achieve the goal. Joseph Stalin, leader of the Soviet Union created an empire where he was always on top. He let no one even get close enough to take away his power. Stalin’s favorite ways of winning the people’s acceptance was through his use of propaganda, national pride, and force. Stalin wanted to be portrayed to his people as a hero. He demanded and censored all propaganda so that he was constantly shown in a good, heroic light. Stalin even used children in some propaganda to paint a good image for him. Another way Stalin achieved the goal was through force. If you were against the government in any way, you were immediately gone. He would eliminate you. Stalin also was so power hungry, even if you weren’t against the government, he’d pick random people, say they were traitors, and kill them. Which led to the deaths of many people in the Soviet Union. The last way Stalin got support from his people was through his use of national pride. Stalin industrialized the Soviet Union. He created a country that it’s citizens could be proud of. He made sure his people only saw the benefits of industrializing instead of the horrible things he was really doing. Stalin made his country proud, which led his people to support him. Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin all had one big trait in common. They were all manipulators. They were so good at manipulation that people didn’t even know they were being manipulated. Each regime used it’s own techniques and tactics to gain total control. These all worked for a decent amount of time. But all wound up failing in the end, leading to the downfall of the regimes. Each regime accomplished the goal in the quote by using multiple types of manipulation. Unfortunately, by the tim many citizen’s realized this†¦ It was already too late. How to cite Totalitarian Essay, Essay examples Totalitarian Essay Free Essays Nando Gehring Mr. Woodruff 3 13 February, 2013 Totalitarian Essay In a democracy, people are free to do what they please and cannot be punished, persecuted, or terrorized for expressing their beliefs by the government. That is why democracy is a better form of government than Fascism, Nazism, and Communism. We will write a custom essay sample on Totalitarian Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now People all over the world are terrorized for what they look like or what they believe in and this is even enforced by some forms of government in the world. Under the U. S democracy, every person has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness which encourages citizens to favor the government and most importantly trust it. Democracy is a better form of government than any form of totalitarianism because with less chance of conflict in a country where the leaders are loved rather than feared, the government has more time to focus on important issues such as industrialization, foreign policies, and imperialization. By analyzing the totalitarian leaders of this time like Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini we can better understand why democracy is such an effective form of government. Ruling with an iron fist, Joseph Stalin took control of Russia in 1922 after Vladimir Lenin had a stroke and Leon Trotsky had been exiled. He was a totalitarian leader who wanted to create a purely communist world with no social classes. He created the five years plan, which set goals for the future of the Soviets economy. He used collective farming, command economy, and the great purge in order to industrialize Russia. The great purge was a movement by Stalin to eliminate or exile anyone who threatened his power of the communist party and anyone who disagreed with his beliefs or policies. Similar in his ideals, Adolf Hitler, The dictator of Germany was also a leader that achieved total control of his country. Hitler was a very harsh religious persecutor who started the holocaust in which approximately 6 million Jewish people were killed by guns, gas, scientific experiments, and torture. Hitler also believed in racial superiority and that the Aryan race was the only pure race and the only one that should exist. The Germans also needed â€Å"lebensraum†, which means living space. They needed to gain land in Europe so that the population had enough room to live and so that they could expand the Aryan race. Another totalitarian dictator, Benito Mussolini, leader of Italy from 1922 to 1943, was a key figure in the creation of fascism. Just like Hitler, he was very racist and controlled his people with terror and censorship. While being an extreme nationalist he ruled over Italy with the strength of his military and his secret police, just like Stalin. Similar to Russia, Italy was also dealing with economic hardships. It is a downfall when the dictator is solely in charge of every economic decision of country. All three of these leaders ruled by being feared not loved, which ended up being bad for them because it caused resentment among the people and they wanted a new and better form of government. Therefore democracy is a better form of government because the people have a say in the government and the choices the leaders of their country makes. They will not be forced to go to war or give up all their money for the good of the country. If people have an opportunity to make a change in their government by voting, they will be able to decide which direction the country needs to go. How to cite Totalitarian Essay, Essays

Human Dignity and Realisation of Common Good

Question: Discuss about theHuman Dignity and Realisation of Common Good. Answer: Introduction Human is the clearest reflection of God and the best media to see god in the world is through human. The consensus in the western world has long supported human dignity and human rights especially in business as in professional practice safeguarding the human dignity is one major job. The different religious rendezvous in churches and temples and mosques all have emphasised on the human dignity and state that it is the ultimate intrinsic quality which cannot be separated from the human life which makes this indispensable for humans (Higgins, 2011). Human dignity has been divided by two different schools of thought one is religious that tries to visualize everything through the eyes of god and the other is political version which focuses on looking at the fundamental rights of people living in a society. Human dignity largely goes hand in hand with the realisation of common good that mainly focuses on the respect of the common being, social well being for the people and peace and stab ility for communities (Ife, 2012). After the industrial revolution in 1890s the huge social upheaval was experienced which mainly indicated the growing concern of people to have their fundamental rights in place which establishes human dignity. With the advent of new technologies and new management studies it has been seen that a paradigm of change from the mechanistic management studies to humanistic management has assumed the place which has helped a lot of manager to manage the business activities with respect to restoring common good and human dignity in service (Donati, 2012). With the arrival of information system which happens to be the domain of numerous students nowadays ask for a greater attention given to human rights and to the common good of the people. With the concept of information technology gaining importance more and more people have taken to the internet to use it for their personal purpose. IT is one of the most important industries in the world nowadays and people highly rely on the IT to safegua rd their personal information (Higgins, 2011). As an IT student it is important to realise the fact that IT makes personal information of people highly vulnerable to threats. The essence of IT relies on safety and security of the clients and professionally working on the field of IT asks for maintain consumers relations effectively which could be done with effective communication (Reardon, 2010). The key problems lie in IT is the privacy of clients and their data. With increasing internet scams safeguarding clients privacy is safeguarding their fundamental rights. For the realisation of common good it is important as an IT person to make sure that clients data are kept confidential. As the subject of human dignity teaches to be fair with every person it is important to treat each and every client with the same professionalism that would help to safeguard the rights of the consumers to be safe online effectively (Donati, 2012). In treating every client there should be a moral approach which would help to safeguard the common good of the clients. In the field of Information Technology is filled with ethical issues but as an IT person one should be able to reflect on his or her deeds which would help to make judgments which will help to contribute to the social welfare of the community. As an IT person working in the field of information technology needs to assess the essentiali ty to safeguarding the personal and confidential data effectively. For instance working as an IT person it is important to understand the IT needs of the consumers and also safeguarding their safety and security needs. Following the Ubuntu principle an IT person is available for every people. For example supporting online transactions and securing the gateways with Firewall and defenders to stop hacking or data theft. The role of IT workers is to cement the rights of the IT consumers especially ensuring a clean and clutter free environment. Being an IT person ones job is to focus on providing all kinds of assistance to the consumers for example helping them to move in the right track in the internet and the digital world that is one of the advocacies of the human dignity. Informing the consumer about the possible risks of weak network is one of the main roles of IT workers which is in accordance with the advocacies of the human dignity (Higgins, 2010). Every client should be treated ethically by giving equal importance to one and all which will help to give importance to an entire community in the digital world. As an IT worker it is important to work for the overall good of a community and by providing proper security for the consumers in the field of IT will help to safeguard them from data theft, hacking and data duplicity which will finally help to have harmonizing online environment that will work towards the common good of the consumers and also drive to act ethically for the development of contented society (Reardon, 2010). References Donati, P. (2012). Discovering the relational character of the common good.Sociology and Catholic Social Teaching: Contemporary Theory and Research,6, 193. Higgins, C. (2011).The good life of teaching: An ethics of professional practice(Vol. 22). John Wiley Sons. Ife, J. (2012).Human rights and social work: Towards rights-based practice. Cambridge University Press. Reardon, B. (2010).Educating for human dignity: Learning about rights and responsibilities. University of Pennsylvania Press.